Andrew K. Rose UC Berkeley NBER and CEPR
Revised Draft: November 18, 2003
I’ve argued in a series of papers that the GATT/WTO hasn’t had much effect on either trade or trade policy (these papers and other relevant materials are available under “The Multilateral (GATT/WTO) System and Trade” topic category in my Research webpage). Still, perhaps the WTO has other ambitions. One would like to examine the possible effects of GATT/WTO membership on other international economic phenomena. At the top of the list are: capital flows, FDI, and services. In this brief memo I set out the issues associated with each.
Note: this is an informal, unpublished memo, on which I have not spent much time.
Capital Flows
- Bilateral capital flow data exist for flows between the US and the ROW. The website is www.ustreas.gov/tic/
- Still, there are serious problems.
-
- The data set is available from 1988 onwards, and only for the US vis-à-vis the rest of the world. During this period of time, there were data for few countries that switched GATT/WTO status, and few outsiders.
- Outsiders: Bahamas, Bermuda (?), Lebanon, Liberia, Russia, Syria
- Switchers: Bulgaria, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama, Venezuela
- After 1999 or questionable: China, Taiwan, Czech Rep (?)
- There is no good bilateral model of capital flows
- The WTO doesn’t say that it tries to liberalize capital flows
- The data set is available from 1988 onwards, and only for the US vis-à-vis the rest of the world. During this period of time, there were data for few countries that switched GATT/WTO status, and few outsiders.
FDI
- Bilateral FDI data is available from the OECD from 1985-1999 [A1].
- The gravity model probably works OK for FDI
- The WTO doesn’t say that it tries to liberalize capital flows. That may not be a serious problem, since some FDI is either a substitute for or a complement to trade in practice.
- Problems
- All the FDI source countries are continuous GATT/WTO members. Still, there are a few outsiders/switchers in the host/recipients
- Switchers: Mexico (barely outside in the sample since it joined in 1986), Morocco (barely), Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela, UAE, Hong Kong (barely)
- Outsiders: Algeria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iran
- Results
- Membership has no economically or statistically significant effect, if you use a standard gravity model estimated with standard panel data techniques. Results are in Table 1 below.
- The output is available here.
Table 1: Determinants of Log of Bilateral FDI Flows [AR2]
Fixed Effects | Random
Effects |
|
Both in GATT/WTO | -.01
(.16) |
.04
(.15) |
GSP | .54
(.78) |
-.11
(.24) |
Regional
FTA |
.16
(.19) |
.54
(.19) |
Log
Distance |
.17
(.14) |
|
Log product Real GDP | -2.79
(.29) |
.43
(.07) |
Log product Real GDP p/c | 2.83
(.30) |
-.17
(.08) |
Currency
Union |
5.04
(1.57) |
|
Common Language | .74
(.29) |
|
Land
Border |
2.38
(.94) |
|
Number Landlocked | -.37
(.24) |
|
Number
Islands |
.77
(.22) |
|
Log product
Land Area |
-.03
(.05) |
|
Currently Colonized | .43
(.47) |
.55
(.49) |
Ever
Colony |
.90
(.47) |
|
R2 | .37 | .33 |
Regressand: log FDI. Intercepts and year controls not reported. 2663 observations in 308 country-pairs.
Services
- Bilateral service trade data exist, gathered by the OECD. The website is http://www.oecd.org/EN/document/0,,EN-document-423-nodirectorate-no-1-32974-24,00.html
- Still, there are problems.
- The data set is available for two years only, 1998-99 and 1999-2000.
- The data exist for bilateral flows between the OECD (always members) and selected other countries. Still, some are not WTO members.
- Results
- At least one country is always a WTO member (since it’s OECD data and all OECD members are in the WTO now). But service trade with non-WTO members is higher with a coefficient of .38 (.18), barely significant. No sign that WTO membership encourages trade in services.
- The output is available here.
Table 2: Determinants of Bilateral Service Flows [AR3]
One in GATT/WTO | .38
(.18) |
GSP | .30
(.13) |
Regional
FTA |
-.16
(.15) |
Log
Distance |
-1.01
(.08) |
Log product Real GDP | .96
(.04) |
Log product Real GDP p/c | .31
(.05) |
Common Language | .99
(.19) |
Land
Border |
.02
(.25) |
Number Landlocked | -.00
(.13) |
Number
Islands |
.20
(.13) |
Log product
Land Area |
-.01
(.03) |
Ever
Colony |
.67
(.37) |
R2 | .80 |
Regressand: log bilateral service trade (exports plus imports). Intercepts and year controls not reported. OLS estimation. 1053 observations.
[A1] We have it in \res\Spiegel\pan>\res\wto\progs\serv1.log
[A2] \res\wto\progs\fdi.log
[A3] \res\wto\progs\fdi.log